This QB class boasts immense potential. Each prospect carries their own set of flaws, but their ceilings reach the stratosphere. From the cream of the crop to the tail end, every quarterback possesses a live arm with ample room for growth. It’s truly a tantalizing array of options, a pick-your-poison scenario for any team.
For those seeking to cultivate a quarterback talent beyond the first round, there exists a select group with the potential to be truly special. Presently, we have Rodgers, Tyrod, and Zach under contract, providing a stable foundation. The assurance of solidified QB positions for this year is indeed a relief.
However, it’s imperative to cast our gaze towards the future. The Aaron Rodgers rollercoaster won’t last indefinitely, and we must capitalize on his expertise while simultaneously grooming our next generation. Establishing a clear succession plan for the QB position is essential for retaining our star players, instilling confidence in the team’s trajectory.
With next year’s quarterback class shrouded in uncertainty, we must seize the opportunity presented to us now. It’s crucial to leverage the resources at our disposal and build upon them for sustained success.
[1] Caleb Williams, USC – (Projected Round – Top 5)
Top Strength: His Mahomesish style of back yard magic 🙂
Top Weakness: His Mahomesish style of back yard magic 🙁
[2] Jayden Daniels, LSU – (Projected Round – Top 5)
Top Strength: Is the toughest QB in this class
Top Weakness: Does he have the frame to handle his brand of football
[3] J.J. McCarthy, Michigan – (Projected Round – Top 10)
Top Strength: Can find success within and outside of structure
Top Weakness: Doesn’t have top tier arm strength
[4] Drake Maye, N. Carolina – (Projected Round – Top 10)
Top Strength: In the upper echelon of measurables and tools
Top Weakness: Needs to be more consistent
[5] Bo Nix, Oregon – (Projected Round – Late 1st – Early 2nd Round)
Top Strength: Isn’t scared when a play breaks down
Top Weakness: Needs to prove himself as a consistent downfield passer
[6] Michael Penix, Washington – (Late 1st – Early 2nd Round)
Top Strength: Has a great pocket presence
Top Weakness: His injury history/age
[7] Jordan Travis, Florida State – (Projected Round – 3rd Round)
Top Strength: Athleticism and ability to throw on the move
Top Weakness: His footwork in the pocket
[8] Spencer Rattler, South Carolina – (Projected Round – Late 3rd – Early 4th Round)
Top Strength: Is hardened by adversity and overcame it
Top Weakness: Ditches clean pockets because of the pressure he felt constantly
[9] Michael Pratt, Tulane – (Projected Round – 4th round)
Top Strength: Confident pocket presence
Top Weakness: Can lose velocity due to footwork
[10] Devin Leary, Kentucky – (Projected Round – 6th Round)
Top Strength: Throws with good velocity in the pocket and on the move
Top Weakness: Has bouts of pretty bad accuracy
You must be logged in to post a comment Login