Paris Saint-Germain lost again in the knockout stages of the Champions League after their loss in Munich (0-2). David Ginola gave a big rant.
Like a year ago, Paris Saint-Germain failed to go further than the knockout stages of the Champions League. Beaten by Bayern Munich at the Parc des Princes less than a month ago (0-1), the capital club lost again in the second leg, suffering a frustrating scenario with a final defeat (0 -2) and poor management of strong and weak times.
Read also – PSG sinks again against Bayern
These repeated disappointments deeply annoy the former glories of the club, like David Ginola. Present on the set of the Canal Champions Club, on Canal +, the former darling of the Parc des Princes believes that the analysis of this new failure must go beyond the framework of the green rectangle. Without quoting Luis Campos, the former attacking midfielder clearly pointed to the failed transfer windows of the Portuguese leader.
Ginola’s huge rant
“ I am disgusted. Disagree on substance and formhe thundered. We end a match with disappointments due to a lack of commitment and investment. There has been a real problem for years. There are players in this team, I wonder at the level of the recruitment policy… How can we have so little bench depth? We are still able to live up to our ambitions, and have players who are up to it. Tonight, Vitinha is not up to par at all. If we want PSG to win the c1, the players have to invest more in the club. Everyone in unison for PSG. We don’t care about the players. »
Criticism of the club’s strategy, Ginola did not spare the players, however. ” They are not fully invested. I take an example. Kimmich, who is in the same position as Verratti, must have lost zero balls. At this level it is what makes the difference. Verratti must be much more present, be a barker. You have to be able to count on him in times like this. Even if it’s a collective elimination. Decisions made from the start. Like playing Hakimi, who has difficulties in her life. He was a shadow of what he is capable of doing…“.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login